Posted 1 year ago
·
Author
Would you rather to fight a human that ate a tiger or a tiger that ate a human?
Posted 1 year ago
It would be more prudent to face a human who ate a tiger rather than a tiger that ate a human. Humans, despite having eaten something as fierce as a tiger, would still be physically less dangerous than a tiger, which is a natural predator with far more developed physical capabilities for combat and hunting. Moreover, there are more possibilities to communicate or reason with a human than with a tiger.
Posted 1 year ago
Maybe the human ate the Tiger in some exotic restaurant, so i'd rather fight the human and not get ripped into pieces by a full grown Tiger.
Posted 1 year ago
@Axtor
Certainly against a human who ate the tiger, because if he ate too much he will be stuffed, feeling sick, and you can catch him off guard in the bathroom
Posted 11 months ago
Lmao what kinda question is this it’s a no brainer to fight the human, that’s a way more fair fight then us against a Tiger.