Posted 4 months ago
·
Author
Would you rather to fight a human that ate a tiger or a tiger that ate a human?
Posted 4 months ago
It would be more prudent to face a human who ate a tiger rather than a tiger that ate a human. Humans, despite having eaten something as fierce as a tiger, would still be physically less dangerous than a tiger, which is a natural predator with far more developed physical capabilities for combat and hunting. Moreover, there are more possibilities to communicate or reason with a human than with a tiger.
Posted 4 months ago
Maybe the human ate the Tiger in some exotic restaurant, so i'd rather fight the human and not get ripped into pieces by a full grown Tiger.
Posted 4 months ago
@Axtor
Certainly against a human who ate the tiger, because if he ate too much he will be stuffed, feeling sick, and you can catch him off guard in the bathroom
Posted 3 months ago
Lmao what kinda question is this it’s a no brainer to fight the human, that’s a way more fair fight then us against a Tiger.